Author(s):
Maite Couto-Ortega, Laida San Sebastian, Leire Markuerkiaga
Email(s):
mcouto@mondragon.edu , lsansebastian@mondragon.edu , lmarkuerkiaga@mondragon.edu
DOI:
10.52711/2231-3915.2026.00002
Address:
Maite Couto-Ortega, Laida San Sebastian, Leire Markuerkiaga
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Production, Innovation-Management-Organization Mondragon Unibertsitatea, Basque Country, Spain.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 16,
Issue - 1,
Year - 2026
ABSTRACT:
Technology Transfer (TT) and Technology Adoption (TA) are vital for economic growth and social development, constituting the 99% of all businesses in the EU. Despite their importance, there is limited understanding of their dynamics in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of publications spanning from 1996 to January 8, 2024. Through a Systematic Literature Review reveals it several notable gaps, one of which is the lack of integration between TT and TA research. While TT research focuses on transferring entities, TA research mainly centres on frameworks delineating key adoption factors. Based on these findings, we propose a research agenda to address the identified gaps, outlining key trends and promising research avenues for TT and TA separately, as well as for integrating TT and TA perspectives within SMEs.
Cite this article:
Maite Couto-Ortega, Laida San Sebastian, Leire Markuerkiaga. Technology Transfer and Adoption in SMEs: A Research Agenda. International Journal of Technology. 2026; 16(1):11-3. doi: 10.52711/2231-3915.2026.00002
Cite(Electronic):
Maite Couto-Ortega, Laida San Sebastian, Leire Markuerkiaga. Technology Transfer and Adoption in SMEs: A Research Agenda. International Journal of Technology. 2026; 16(1):11-3. doi: 10.52711/2231-3915.2026.00002 Available on: https://www.ijtonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-16-1-2
REFERENCES:
1. Rodrigo A, Sutz J. La universidad latinoamericana del futuro. Tendencias, escenarios, alternativas. UDUAL, México; 2001.
2. Popova N, Kryvoruchko O, Shynkarenko V, et al. Enterprise management in VUCA conditions. Economic Annals-XXI 2018;170:27–31. https://doi.org/10.21003/EA.V170-05.
3. Toner P. Workforce skills and innovation: an overview of major themes in the literature. 2011.
4. Zhang K, Wang Q, Wang X, et al. The impact of policy perception on technology transfer from boundary-spanning perspective-empirical evidence from Chinese technological enterprises. Front Psychol 2022;13:974436. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.974436/BIBTEX.
5. Damanpour F, Schneider M. Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management 2006; 17: 215–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8551.2006.00498.X.
6. Nuryakin, Nurjanah A, Ardyan E. Open innovation strategies and SME’s performance: Themediating role of eco-innovation in environmental uncertainty. Management Systems in Production Engineering 2022;30:214–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/MSPE-2022-0027.
7. Kaplinsky R. Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Res Policy 2011;40:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2010.10.003.
8. Yang J, Cheng H. Coupling Coordination between University Scientific & Technological Innovation and Sustainable Economic Development in China. Sustainability 2023;15:2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15032494.
9. Coccia M. Metrics to measure the technology transfer absorption: analysis of the relationship between institutes and adopters in northern Italy. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 2005;4:462–86. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTTC.2005.006699.
10. Guo Z, Shen J, Li L. Identifying the implementation effect of technology transfer policy using system dynamics: a case study in Liaoning, China. J Technol Transf 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09989-z.
11. Uusitalo P, Lavikka R. Technology transfer in the construction industry. J Technol Transf 2021;46:1291–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09820-7.
12. Bengoa A, Maseda A, Iturralde T, et al. A bibliometric review of the technology transfer literature. J Technol Transf 2020;46:1514–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-019-09774-5.
13. Kassouri Y, Alola AA. Examining the interaction of technology adoption-diffusion and sectoral emission intensity in developing and emerging countries. J Clean Prod 2023;405:136920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136920.
14. Loo MK, Ramachandran S, Raja Yusof RN. Unleashing the potential: Enhancing technology adoption and innovation for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). Cogent Economics & Finance 2023;11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2267748.
15. European Patent Office. Patent knowledge and technology transfer n.d.
16. Carr VH. Technology Adoption and Diffusion. The Learning Center for Interactive Technology 1999.
17. Moreno del Castillo A. Building a knowledge society during Japan’s coronavirus pandemic. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education 2023;4. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/12692.
18. Lee S, Kim BS, Kim Y, et al. The framework for factors affecting technology transfer for suppliers and buyers of technology in Korea. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 2018;30:172–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1297787.
19. Kuhl L. Technology transfer and adoption for smallholder climate change adaptation: opportunities and challenges. Clim Dev 2020;12:353–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1630349.
20. Min J-W, Vonortas NS, Kim Y. Commercialization of transferred public technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2019;138:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.003.
21. Sepasgozar SME, Davis S. Construction Technology Adoption Cube: An Investigation on Process, Factors, Barriers, Drivers and Decision Makers Using NVivo and AHP Analysis. Buildings 2018;8:74. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS8060074.
22. Kuhl L. Technology transfer and adoption for smallholder climate change adaptation: opportunities and challenges. Clim Dev 2019;12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1630349.
23. European Commission. Una Estrategia Para Las Pymes En Pro De Una Europa Sostenible Y Digital - Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de las Regiones. Bruselas: 2020.
24. European Commission. Unleashing the full potential of European SMEs. European Commission 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/ presscorner/detail/en/fs_20_426 (accessed November 13, 2023).
25. Zamani SZ. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) facing an evolving technological era: a systematic literature review on the adoption of technologies in SMEs. European Journal Of Innovation Management 2022;25:735–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2021-0360.
26. Aligarh F, Sutopo B, Widarjo W. The antecedents of cloud computing adoption and its consequences for MSMEs’ performance: A model based on the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework. Cogent Business & Management 2023;10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2220190.
27. Cannavacciuolo L, Ferraro G, Ponsiglione C, et al. Technological innovation-enabling industry 4.0 paradigm: A systematic literature review. Technovation 2023;124:102733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102733.
28. Audretsch DB, Guenther C. SME research: SMEs’ internationalization and collaborative innovation as two central topics in the field. Journal of Business Economics 2023;93:1213–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01152-w.
29. Owen R, Botelho T, Mac An Bhaird C, et al. Entrepreneurial Finance for Green Innovative SMEs. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 2023;70:942–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3224870.
30. Justy T, Pellegrin-Boucher E, Lescop D, et al. On the edge of Big Data: Drivers and barriers to data analytics adoption in SMEs. Technovation 2023;127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102850.
31. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:332–9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
32. Tahamtan I, Safipour Afshar A, Ahamdzadeh K. Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics 2016;107:1195–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2.
33. Walker K. A Systematic Review of the Corporate Reputation Literature: Definition, Measurement, and Theory. Corporate Reputation Review 2010;12:357–87. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2009.26.
34. Crossan MM, Apaydin M. A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Management Studies 2010;47:1154–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x.
35. Melin G, Persson O. Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics 1996;36:363–77.
36. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:UQRP20;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI.
37. Apa R, De Marchi V, Grandinetti R, et al. University-SME collaboration and innovation performance: the role of informal relationships and absorptive capacity. J Technol Transf 2021;46:961–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09802-9.
38. O’Reilly P, Cunningham JA. Enablers and barriers to university technology transfer engagements with small- and medium-sized enterprises: perspectives of Principal Investigators. Small Enterprise Research 2017;24:274–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13215906.2017.1396245.
39. Collier A, Gray BJ, Ahn MJ. Enablers and barriers to university and high technology SME partnerships. Small Enterprise Research 2011;18:2–18. https://doi.org/10.5172/ser.18.1.2.
40. Deschamps I, Macedo MG, Eve-Levesque C. University-SME Collaboration and Open Innovation: Intellectual-Property Management Tools and the Roles of Intermediaries. Technology Innovation Management Review 2013;3:33–41. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/668.
41. Garcia-Perez-de-Lema D, Madrid-Guijarro A, Martin DP. Influence of university-firm governance on SMEs innovation and performance levels. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2017;123:250–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.003.
42. Trencher G, Yarime M, McCormick KB, et al. Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Sci Public Policy 2014;41:151–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct044.
43. Petruzzelli AM, Murgia G. A multilevel analysis of the technological impact of university-SME joint innovations. Journal of Small Business Management 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1874003.
44. Ndonzuau FN, Pirnay F, Surlemont B. A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation 2002;22:281–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00019-0.
45. Pirnay F, Surlemont B, Nlemvo F. Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Business Economics 2003;21:355–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026167105153.
46. Bonardo D, Paleari S, Vismara S. The M&A dynamics of European science-based entrepreneurial firms. J Technol Transf 2010;35:141–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9109-3.
47. Albors-Garrigos J, Rincon-Diaz CA, Igartua-Lopez JI. Research technology organisations as leaders of R&D collaboration with SMEs: role, barriers and facilitators. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 2014;26:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.850159.
48. Albors-Garrigos J, Zabaleta N, Ganzarain J. New R&D management paradigms: rethinking research and technology organizations strategies in regions. R & D Management 2010;40:435–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00611.x.
49. Hilkenmeier F, Fechtelpeter C, Decius J. How to foster innovation in SMEs: evidence of the effectiveness of a project-based technology transfer approach. J Technol Transf 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09913-x.
50. Puliga G, Manzini R, Lazzarotti V, et al. Successfully managing SMEs collaborations with public research institutes: the case of ITER fusion projects. Innovation-Organization & Management 2020;22:353–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1685889.
51. Coccia M. Spatial mobility of knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity: analysis and measurement of the impact within the geoeconomic space. J Technol Transf 2008;33:105–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9032-4.
52. Liu HY, Subramanian AM, Hang CC. Marrying the Best of Both Worlds: An Integrated Framework for Matching Technology Transfer Sources and Recipients. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 2020;67:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2858812.
53. Liu HY, Subramanian AM, Hang CC. In Search of the Perfect Match: A Configurational Approach to Technology Transfer in Singapore. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 2021;68:574–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2901029.
54. Lin JL, Fang SC, Fang SR, et al. Network embeddedness and technology transfer performance in R&D consortia in Taiwan. Technovation 2009;29:763–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.001.
55. Pansiri J. The effects of characteristics of partners on strategic alliance performance in the SME dominated travel sector. Tour Manag 2008;29:101–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.03.023.
56. Beecham MA, Cordey-Hayes M. Partnering and knowledge transfer in the UK motor industry. Technovation 1998;18:191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00113-2.
57. Salehi F, Shapira P, Zolkiewski J. Commercialization networks in emerging technologies: the case of UK nanotechnology small and midsize enterprises. J Technol Transf 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09923-3.
58. Prasad SB. Technology-transfer - The approach of a Dutch multinational. Technovation 1986;4:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(86)90019-2.
59. King DR, Nowack ML. The impact of government policy on technology transfer: an aircraft industry case study. Journal of Engineering And Technology Management 2003;20:303–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.08.007.
60. Jagoda K, Maheshwari B, Lonseth R. Key issues in managing technology transfer projects Experiences from a Canadian SME. Management Decision 2010;48:366–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011037747.
61. Carayannis EG, Meissner D, Edelkina A. Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice. Journal of Technology Transfer 2017;42:460–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9433-8.
62. Bessant J. The rise and fall of “Supernet”: a case study of technology transfer policy for smaller firms. Res Policy 1999;28:601–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00002-5.
63. Szabo ZK, Soltes M, Herman E. Innovative Capacity & Performance Of Transition Economies: Comparative Study At The Level Of Enterprises. E & M Ekonomie a Management 2013;16:52–68.
64. Mukherjee S. Challenges to Indian micro small scale and medium enterprises in the era of globalization. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research 2018;8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-018-0115-5.
65. Nepelski D, Piroli G. Organizational diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research projects. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 2018;43:615–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9624-6.
66. Sheth BP, Acharya SR, Sareen SB. Policy implications for the improvement of technology transfer and commercialization process in the Indian context. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 2019;10:214–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-09-2017-0043.
67. Kim Z, Morley I, Chung Y. Factors influencing the technology transfer fee: evidence from the public energy sector. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 2023;35:30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1964464.
68. Battistella C, Ferraro G, Pessot E. Technology transfer services impacts on open innovation capabilities of SMEs. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2023;196:122875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122875.
69. Garengo P. How bridging organisations manage technology transfer in SMEs: an empirical investigation. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 2019;31:477–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1520976.
70. Azzone G, Maccarrone P. The emerging role of lean infrastructures in technology transfer: the case of the Innovation Plaza project. Technovation 1997;17:391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(96)00119-8.
71. Reidolf M. Knowledge networks and the nature of knowledge relationships of innovative rural SMEs. European Journal Of Innovation Management 2016;19:317–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2015-0043.
72. Chege SM, Wang DP. The impact of technology transfer on agribusiness performance in Kenya. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 2020;32:332–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1657568.
73. Turk Z. Structured analysis of ICT adoption in the European construction industry. International Journal Of Construction Management 2023;23:756–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1925396.
74. Del Aguila-Obra AR, Padilla-Melendez A. Organizational factors affecting Internet technology adoption. Internet Research 2006;16:94–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240610642569.
75. Kuan KKY, Chau PYK. A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework. Information & Management 2001;38:507–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00073-8.
76. Ifinedo P. Internet/e-business technologies acceptance in Canada’s SMEs: an exploratory investigation. Internet Research 2011;21:255–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111139309.
77. Arnold C, Voigt KI. Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies. International Journal Of Innovation And Technology Management 2019;16. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987701950038X.
78. Matias JB, Hernandez AA. Cloud Computing Adoption Intention by MSMEs in the Philippines. Global Business Review 2021;22:612–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918818262.
79. Ghobakhloo M, Tang SH. Barriers to Electronic Commerce Adoption Among Small Businesses in Iran. Journal of Electronic Commerce In Organizations 2011;9:48–89. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeco.2011100103.
80. Eze SC, Chinedu-Eze VC, Bello AO. Some antecedent factors that shape SMEs adoption of social media marketing applications: a hybrid approach. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 2020;12:41–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-06-2019-0063.
81. Pranata N, Soekarni M, Mychelisda E, et al. Technology Adoption Issues and Challenges for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises: A Case Study of the Food and Beverage Sub-Sector in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business 2022;9:265–74. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no3.0265.
82. Ansong E, Boateng SL. Reaching for the “‘Cloud’”: The Case of an SME in a Developing Economy. International Journal of E-Business Research 2023;19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEBR.319324.
83. Vu NH, Hoang TB, Pham HMT, et al. Improving business environment for information technology adoption in small business: evidence from a transition economy. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2023.2294978.
84. Sharma S, Singh G, Islam N, et al. Why Do SMEs Adopt Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots? IEEE Trans Eng Manag 2022;1:1773–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3203469.
85. Ahmad SZ, Abu Bakar AR, Ahmad N. Social media adoption and its impact on firm performance: the case of the UAE. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 2019;25:84–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-08-2017-0299.
86. Kumar D, Samalia H V, Verma P. Exploring suitability of cloud computing for small and medium-sized enterprises in India. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2017;24:814–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2017-0002.
87. Su J, Zhang Y, Wu X. How market pressures and organizational readiness drive digital marketing adoption strategies’ evolution in small and medium enterprises. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2023;193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122655.
88. Sharma A, Sharma S. Digital marketing adoption by small travel agencies: a comprehensive PLS-SEM model using reflective and higher-order formative constructs. European Journal of Innovation Management 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2022-0532.
89. Mannan B, Haleem A. Understanding major dimensions and determinants that help in diffusion & adoption of product innovation: using AHP approach. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research 2017;7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-017-0072-4.
90. Maroufkhani P, Ismail WKW, Ghobakhloo M. Big data analytics adoption model for small and medium enterprises. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 2020;11:171–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0018.
91. Asiaei A, Ab Rahim NZ. A multifaceted framework for adoption of cloud computing in Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 2019;10:708–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2018-0053.
92. Abbad M, Magboul IHM, AiQeisi K. Determinants and outcomes of e-business adoption among manufacturing SMEs: Insights from a developing country. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 2022;13:456–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2021-0049.
93. Sciarelli M, Prisco A, Gheith MH, et al. Factors affecting the adoption of blockchain technology in innovative Italian companies: an extended TAM approach. Journal of Strategy And Management 2022;15:495–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2021-0054.
94. Ghobakhloo M, Tang SH. The role of owner/manager in adoption of electronic commerce in small businesses The case of developing countries. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2013;20:754–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-12-2011-0037.
95. Hashem G, Tann J. The adoption of ISO 9000 standards within the Egyptian context: A diffusion of innovation approach. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2007;18:631–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360701349435.
96. Wu CH, Kao SC, Lin HH. Acceptance of enterprise blog for service industry. Internet Research 2013;23:260–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 10662241311331736.
97. Casidy R, Nyadzayo M, Mohan M. Service innovation and adoption in industrial markets: An SME perspective. Industrial Marketing Management 2020;89:157–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.06.008.
98. Thong JYL. Resource constraints and information systems implementation in Singaporean small businesses. Omega-International Journal Of Management Science 2001;29:143–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00035-9.
99. Adhikary A, Diatha KS, Borah SB, et al. How does the adoption of digital payment technologies influence unorganized retailers’ performance? An investigation in an emerging market. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science 2021;49:882–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00778-y.
100. Audretsch DB, Belitski M. Knowledge complexity and firm performance: evidence from the European SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management 2021;25:693–713. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2020-0178.
101. Franquesa J, Brandyberry A. Organizational Slack and Information Technology Innovation Adoption in SMEs. International Journal Of E-Business Research 2009;5:25–48. https://doi.org/10.4018/jebr.2009010102.
102. Martin LM, Matlay H. “Blanket” approaches to promoting ICT in small firms: some lessons from the DTI ladder adoption model in the UK. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications And Policy 2001;11:399–410. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006118.
103. Xu M, Rohatgi R, Duan YQ. E-Business Adoption in SMEs: Some Preliminary Findings from Electronic Components Industry. International Journal Of E-Business Research 2007;3:74–90. https://doi.org/10.4018/jebr.2007010105.
104. Chibelushi C, Costello P. Challenges facing W. Midlands ICT-oriented SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2009;16:210–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000910956029.
105. Spinelli R, Dyerson R, Harindranath G. IT readiness in small firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2013;20:807–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2012-0012.
106. Astuti NC, Nasution RA. Technology Readiness and E-Commerce Adoption among Entrepreneurs of SMEs in Bandung City, Indonesia. Gadjah Mada International Journal Of Business 2014;16:69–88. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5468.
107. Harrison DA, Mykytyn PP, Riemenschneider CK. Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: Theory and empirical tests. Information Systems Research 1997;8:171–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.2.171.
108. Lee Y, Lim W, Eng HS. A systematic review of UTAUT2 constructs’ analysis among MSMEs in non-OECD countries. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 2024;15:765–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2022-0140.
109. Chuang TT, Nakatani K, Zhou D. An exploratory study of the extent of information technology adoption in SMEs: an application of upper echelon theory. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2009;22:183. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390910932821.
110. Kusuma H, Muafi M, Aji HM, et al. Information and Communication Technology Adoption in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Demographic Characteristics. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business 2020;7:969–80. https://doi.org/10.13106/ jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.969.
111. Middleton KL, Byus K. Information and communications technology adoption and use in small and medium businesses: The influence of Hispanic ethnicity. Management Research Review 2011;34:98–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111096496.
112. Cimini C, Boffelli A, Lagorio A, et al. How do industry 4.0 technologies influence organisational change? An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 2021;32:695–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-0135.
113. Eze SC, Chinedu-Eze VC, Bello AO. Actors and emerging information, communications and technology (EICT) adoption: A study of UK small and medium services enterprises’. Cogent Business & Management 2018;5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1480188.
114. Ukobitz DV, Faullant R. The relative impact of isomorphic pressures on the adoption of radical technology: Evidence from 3D printing. Technovation 2022;113:102418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102418.
115. Durkin M, McGowan P, McKeown N. Exploring social media adoption in small to medium-sized enterprises in Ireland. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2013;20:716–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-08-2012-0094.
116. Singh A, Thakkar J, Jenamani M. An integrated Grey-DEMATEL approach for evaluating ICT adoption barriers in manufacturing SMEs Analysing Indian MSMEs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2022;35:1425–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2018-0211.
117. Sepasgozar SME, Hawken S, Sargolzaei S, et al. Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2019;142:105–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.012.
118. Thong JYL, Yap CS. CEO Characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses. Omega-International Journal Of Management Science 1995;23:429–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00017-I.
119. Nilashi M, Ahmadi H, Ahani A, et al. Determining the importance of Hospital Information System adoption factors using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP). Technol Forecast Soc Change 2016;111:244–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.008.
120. Wamba SF, Carter L. Social Media Tools Adoption and Use by SMES: An Empirical Study. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 2014;26:1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2014040101.
121. Peltier JW, Zhao YS, Schibrowsky JA. Technology adoption by small businesses: An exploratory study of the interrelationships of owner and environmental factors. International Small Business Journal - Researching Entrepreneurship 2012;30:406–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0266242610365512.
122. Taiminen HM, Karjaluoto H. The usage of digital marketing channels in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2015;22:633–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2013-0073.
123. Antlova K. Motivation and barriers of ICT adoption in Small and medium-sized enterprises. E & M Ekonomie a Management 2009;12:140–55.
124. Martínez-Roman JA, Romero I. Determinants of innovativeness in SMEs: disentangling core innovation and technology adoption capabilities. Review Of Managerial Science 2017;11:543–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0196-x.
125. Aleke B, Ojiako U, Wainwright DW. ICT adoption in developing countries: perspectives from small-scale agribusinesses. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2011;24:68–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391111097438.
126. Lefebvre LA, Lefebvre E, Harvey J. Intangible assets as determinants of advanced manufacturing technology adoption in SME’s: Toward an evolutionary model. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 1996;43:307–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.511841.
127. Kim SH, Jang SY, Yang KH. Analysis of the Determinants of Software-as-a-Service Adoption in Small Businesses: Risks, Benefits, and Organizational and Environmental Factors. Journal of Small Business Management 2017;55:303–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12304.
128. Brown DH, Kaewkitipong L. Relative size and complexity: e-business use in small and medium sized tourism enterprises in Thailand. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2009;22:212–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390910932849.
129. Nair J, Chellasamy A, Singh BNB. Readiness factors for information technology adoption in SMEs: testing an exploratory model in an Indian context. Journal of Asia Business Studies 2019;13:694–718. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-09-2018-0254.
130. Vagnani G, Gatti C, Proietti L. A conceptual framework of the adoption of innovations in organizations: a meta-analytical review of the literature. Journal of Management & Governance 2019;23:1023–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09452-6.
131. Martínez-Román JA, Romero I. Determinants of technology adoption in the retail trade industry-the case of SMEs in Spain. Amfiteatru Economic 2015;17:646–60.
132. Kumia S, Choudrie J, Mahbubur RM, et al. E-commerce technology adoption: A Malaysian grocery SME retail sector study. J Bus Res 2015;68:1906–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.12.010.
133. Hassan SS, Reuter C, Bzhalava L. Perception or capabilities? An empirical investigation of the factors influencing the adoption of social media and public cloud in German SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management 2021;25:2150002. https://doi.org/10.1142/ S136391962150002X.
134. Chouki M, Talea M, Okar C, et al. Barriers to Information Technology Adoption Within Small and Medium Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal Of Technology Management 2020;17:2050007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877020500078.
135. Doherty E, Carcary M, Conway G. Examining the drivers and barriers to adoption of cloud computing by SMEs in Ireland: an exploratory study. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2015;22:512–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2013-0069.
136. Wymer S, Regan E. Influential Factors in the Adoption and Use of E-Business and E-Commerce Information Technology (EEIT) by Small & Medium Businesses. Journal of Electronic Commerce In Organizations 2011;9:56–82. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeco.2011010104.
137. Simmons G, Armstrong GA, Durkin MG. A conceptualization of the determinants of small business website adoption - Setting the research agenda. International Small Business Journal - Researching Entrepreneurship 2008;26:351–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242608088743.
138. Nguyen TH, Newby M, Macaulay MJ. Information Technology Adoption in Small Business: Confirmation of a Proposed Framework. Journal of Small Business Management 2015;53:207–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12058.
139. Mero J, Leinonen M, Makkonen H, et al. Agile logic for SaaS implementation: Capitalizing on marketing automation software in a start-up. J Bus Res 2022;145:583–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.026.
140. Mahdiraji HA, Yaftiyan F, Abbasi-Kamardi A, et al. A synthesis of boundary conditions with adopting digital platforms in SMEs: an intuitionistic multi-layer decision-making framework. Journal of Technology Transfer 2023;48:1723–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10028-8.
141. He W, Wang FK, Chen Y, et al. An exploratory investigation of social media adoption by small businesses. Information Technology & Management 2017;18:149–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-015-0243-3.
142. Sepasgozar SME, Loosemore M, Davis SR. Conceptualising information and equipment technology adoption in construction A critical review of existing research. Engineering Construction And Architectural Management 2016;23:158–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2015-0083.
143. Sepasgozar SME, Davis S, Loosemore M, et al. An investigation of modern building equipment technology adoption in the Australian construction industry. Engineering Construction And Architectural Management 2018;25:1075–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2017-0052.
144. Yacob P, Wong LS, Khor SC. An empirical investigation of green initiatives and environmental sustainability for manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 30, 2019, p. 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2017-0153.
145. Kholaif MMNHK, Sarwar B, Xiao M, et al. Post-pandemic opportunities for F&B green supply chains and supply chain viability: the moderate effect of blockchains and big data analytics. European Journal of Innovation Management 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2022-0581.
146. Marinelli L, Bartoloni S, Costa A, et al. Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial ecosystem inputs and outcomes: the role of digital technology adoption. European Journal of Innovation Management 2023;26:635–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0119.
147. Chong AYL, Ooi KB, Bao HJ, et al. Can e-business adoption be influenced by knowledge management? An empirical analysis of Malaysian SMEs. Journal Of Knowledge Management 2014;18:121–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2013-0323.
148. Garbellano S, Da Veiga MD. Dynamic capabilities in Italian leading SMEs adopting industry 4.0. Measuring Business Excellence 2019;23:472–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-06-2019-0058.
149. Thoumrungroje A, Racela OC. Linking SME international marketing agility to new technology adoption. International Small Business Journal-Researching Entrepreneurship 2022;40:801–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211054651.
150. Canhoto AI, Quinton S, Pera R, et al. Digital strategy aligning in SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Small Business Management 2021;30:101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101682.
151. Restuputri DP, Septira AP, Masudin I. The Role of Creative Leadership to Improve Organizational Performance Through Organizational Ambidexterity in Creative-Based SMEs. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3318630.
152. Skare M, Buric SB. Technology adoption and human capital: exploring the gender and cross-country impact 1870-2010. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 2022;34:1170–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1948988.
153. Lashitew AA. When businesses go digital: The role of CEO attributes in technology adoption and utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2023;189:122324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122324.
154. Saura JR, Palacios-Marques D, Ribeiro-Soriano D. Leveraging SMEs technologies adoption in the Covid-19 pandemic: a case study on Twitter-based user-generated content. Journal of Technology Transfer 2023;48:1696–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10023-z.
155. Petruzzelli AM, Murgia G, Parmentola A. How can open innovation support SMEs in the adoption of I4.0 technologies? An empirical analysis. R & D Management 2022;52:615–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12507.
156. Liu HY, Subramanian AM, Hang CC. Marrying the Best of Both Worlds: An Integrated Framework for Matching Technology Transfer Sources and Recipients. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 2020;67:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2858812.
157. Shetty JP, Panda R. A multidimensional framework for cloud adoption of SMEs in India. International Journal Of Indian Culture And Business Management 2020;20:210–33. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2020.105640.
158. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations - Third Edition 1962.
159. Premkumar G, Roberts M. Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega (Westport) 1999;27:467–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00071-1.
160. Nguyen TH. Information technology adoption in SMEs: an integrated framework. International Journal Of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 2009;15:162–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550910944566.
161. Miceli MF, Ameduri S, Dimino I, et al. A Preliminary Technology Readiness Assessment of Morphing Technology Applied to Case Studies. Biomimetics 2023;8:24. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOMIMETICS8010024.
162. Manning CG. Technology Readiness Level. NASA 2023. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/engineering/technology/ technology_readiness_level (accessed May 22, 2023).